<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paul&#8217;s Epistles to the Thessalonians Follow-Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesmoakhouse.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/pauls-epistles-to-the-thessalonians-follow-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesmoakhouse.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/pauls-epistles-to-the-thessalonians-follow-up/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoak, there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dating Revelation with a Few Simple Words &#171; The Smoak House</title>
		<link>http://thesmoakhouse.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/pauls-epistles-to-the-thessalonians-follow-up/#comment-4127</link>
		<dc:creator>Dating Revelation with a Few Simple Words &#171; The Smoak House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesmoakhouse.com/index.php/2007/10/19/pauls-epistles-to-the-thessalonians-follow-up/#comment-4127</guid>
		<description>[...] made my postion on eschatology abundantly clear in the past (see my Olivet Discourse article and my 1 Thessalonians article). I have not however recounted what caused me to change my position in the first place. It comes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] made my postion on eschatology abundantly clear in the past (see my Olivet Discourse article and my 1 Thessalonians article). I have not however recounted what caused me to change my position in the first place. It comes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh H.</title>
		<link>http://thesmoakhouse.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/pauls-epistles-to-the-thessalonians-follow-up/#comment-3359</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesmoakhouse.com/index.php/2007/10/19/pauls-epistles-to-the-thessalonians-follow-up/#comment-3359</guid>
		<description>I believe that is a very astute observation, Al.  We are definitely with or in the presence of Christ by virtue of His Spirit which is within us.  Remember that Jesus said he would send &quot;another&quot; Helper.  That word &quot;another&quot; in greek means &quot;one just like the first.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that is a very astute observation, Al.  We are definitely with or in the presence of Christ by virtue of His Spirit which is within us.  Remember that Jesus said he would send &#8220;another&#8221; Helper.  That word &#8220;another&#8221; in greek means &#8220;one just like the first.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://thesmoakhouse.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/pauls-epistles-to-the-thessalonians-follow-up/#comment-3358</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesmoakhouse.com/index.php/2007/10/19/pauls-epistles-to-the-thessalonians-follow-up/#comment-3358</guid>
		<description>I do agree that the word rapture does not exist in the bible. But their are many words that we use that are not in
the bible. It also seems like that you are forgetting the last part of verse 17.&quot;And thus we shall always be with the
Lord.&quot; Do you think that we are always with the Lord? The Holy Spirit is with us which is the Helper Jesus Christ
sent to us. Again these are question as I, like Josh try to hammer out to understand this stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do agree that the word rapture does not exist in the bible. But their are many words that we use that are not in<br />
the bible. It also seems like that you are forgetting the last part of verse 17.&#8221;And thus we shall always be with the<br />
Lord.&#8221; Do you think that we are always with the Lord? The Holy Spirit is with us which is the Helper Jesus Christ<br />
sent to us. Again these are question as I, like Josh try to hammer out to understand this stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://thesmoakhouse.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/pauls-epistles-to-the-thessalonians-follow-up/#comment-3357</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesmoakhouse.com/index.php/2007/10/19/pauls-epistles-to-the-thessalonians-follow-up/#comment-3357</guid>
		<description>for the purpose, as it notes, to prove that Christ was Lord</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for the purpose, as it notes, to prove that Christ was Lord</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://thesmoakhouse.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/pauls-epistles-to-the-thessalonians-follow-up/#comment-3356</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesmoakhouse.com/index.php/2007/10/19/pauls-epistles-to-the-thessalonians-follow-up/#comment-3356</guid>
		<description>The Matthew 27 passage is interesting, but as you said, it cannot possibly be used in reference to the Resurrection of the Dead, the emptying of Sheol.  1 Cor. 15:22-23 declares Christ the first to partake of the Resurrection.  Whatever resurrections happened at Christ&#039;s death had to be natural resurrections of the type of Lazarus and Jairus&#039; daughter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Matthew 27 passage is interesting, but as you said, it cannot possibly be used in reference to the Resurrection of the Dead, the emptying of Sheol.  1 Cor. 15:22-23 declares Christ the first to partake of the Resurrection.  Whatever resurrections happened at Christ&#8217;s death had to be natural resurrections of the type of Lazarus and Jairus&#8217; daughter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://thesmoakhouse.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/pauls-epistles-to-the-thessalonians-follow-up/#comment-3355</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesmoakhouse.com/index.php/2007/10/19/pauls-epistles-to-the-thessalonians-follow-up/#comment-3355</guid>
		<description>Excellent presentation of your thoughts. Well done. I too am chewing on these ideas. &quot;Things to Come&quot; by J. Dwight Pentecost might be a good resource. The professor I work with uses it as his eschatology book.

There is an interesting passage in Matthew 27:51-  54. I don&#039;t think this would be considered a bodily resurrection of rapture quality but it is interesting to note.

I will review the Undeception link you offered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent presentation of your thoughts. Well done. I too am chewing on these ideas. &#8220;Things to Come&#8221; by J. Dwight Pentecost might be a good resource. The professor I work with uses it as his eschatology book.</p>
<p>There is an interesting passage in Matthew 27:51-  54. I don&#8217;t think this would be considered a bodily resurrection of rapture quality but it is interesting to note.</p>
<p>I will review the Undeception link you offered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
