<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ugly But Effective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesmoakhouse.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/ugly-but-effective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesmoakhouse.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/ugly-but-effective/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoak, there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://thesmoakhouse.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/ugly-but-effective/#comment-3517</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 03:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesmoakhouse.com/index.php/2008/04/14/ugly-but-effective/#comment-3517</guid>
		<description>So, any antenna labeled &quot;HDTV Ready!&quot; or &quot;Digital&quot; is just marketing hype. TV is still operating in the same set of frequencies as before (a smaller set of frequencies, but no additional ones). The frequency you are trying to receive is the determining factor in what antenna you need.

The only thing that has changed with TV is how they send the signal. Digital instead of Analog. Antennas don&#039;t care what&#039;s on the carrier, just what wavelength it&#039;s at.

That&#039;s the short version. If you want, I have a longer version that requires a projector, bed sheet, a glass of water and a rather large white board and markers.

:-)

Have a good weekend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, any antenna labeled &#8220;HDTV Ready!&#8221; or &#8220;Digital&#8221; is just marketing hype. TV is still operating in the same set of frequencies as before (a smaller set of frequencies, but no additional ones). The frequency you are trying to receive is the determining factor in what antenna you need.</p>
<p>The only thing that has changed with TV is how they send the signal. Digital instead of Analog. Antennas don&#8217;t care what&#8217;s on the carrier, just what wavelength it&#8217;s at.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the short version. If you want, I have a longer version that requires a projector, bed sheet, a glass of water and a rather large white board and markers.<br />
 <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/face-smile.png' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Have a good weekend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh H.</title>
		<link>http://thesmoakhouse.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/ugly-but-effective/#comment-3516</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesmoakhouse.com/index.php/2008/04/14/ugly-but-effective/#comment-3516</guid>
		<description>Learn me, Heath.  Learn me.

@Lance: Thanks, Lance. That really helped clear things up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Learn me, Heath.  Learn me.</p>
<p>@Lance: Thanks, Lance. That really helped clear things up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://thesmoakhouse.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/ugly-but-effective/#comment-3515</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesmoakhouse.com/index.php/2008/04/14/ugly-but-effective/#comment-3515</guid>
		<description>*Slaps forehead*

Digital Antenna?

Your geek-fu is weak. Come let me educate you in the ways of RF goodness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Slaps forehead*</p>
<p>Digital Antenna?</p>
<p>Your geek-fu is weak. Come let me educate you in the ways of RF goodness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://thesmoakhouse.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/ugly-but-effective/#comment-3514</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesmoakhouse.com/index.php/2008/04/14/ugly-but-effective/#comment-3514</guid>
		<description>Lyndsay, stop, no, Josh has known you longer than he has known that antenna!

There, I hope that settles it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lyndsay, stop, no, Josh has known you longer than he has known that antenna!</p>
<p>There, I hope that settles it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh H.</title>
		<link>http://thesmoakhouse.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/ugly-but-effective/#comment-3513</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesmoakhouse.com/index.php/2008/04/14/ugly-but-effective/#comment-3513</guid>
		<description>Lyndsay! You make me sound so unscrupulous.  Let&#039;s just consider this OUR post.

Now if you go take those pictures we could post up on here lickety-split.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lyndsay! You make me sound so unscrupulous.  Let&#8217;s just consider this OUR post.</p>
<p>Now if you go take those pictures we could post up on here lickety-split.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeez</title>
		<link>http://thesmoakhouse.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/ugly-but-effective/#comment-3512</link>
		<dc:creator>zeez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesmoakhouse.com/index.php/2008/04/14/ugly-but-effective/#comment-3512</guid>
		<description>Ok, so during the 4 hours it took to put that thing on the roof, I suggested that &quot;we&quot; should write a blog post about it and call it...you guessed it...&quot;Ugly but Effective&quot;! What I meant of course was that I would blog about it and call it that. And I was even gonna take a picture of the ugly thing so you would know what it looks like. Post title stealer!!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so during the 4 hours it took to put that thing on the roof, I suggested that &#8220;we&#8221; should write a blog post about it and call it&#8230;you guessed it&#8230;&#8221;Ugly but Effective&#8221;! What I meant of course was that I would blog about it and call it that. And I was even gonna take a picture of the ugly thing so you would know what it looks like. Post title stealer!!  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
